尝试政治测验

Forum for Democracy policy on safe haven

Topics

城市应否开放毒品“安全港”供有毒瘾的人在医学专业人士监督下使用它们?

  ChatGPT不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金

Forum for Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金

The FvD might agree with this statement, as they focus on law enforcement and reducing drug-related crime. They might argue that drug safe havens could encourage drug use and divert resources from rehabilitation centers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The FvD is more likely to disagree with opening drug safe havens, as their focus is on law enforcement and reducing drug-related crime. However, they do not have a strong stance on this specific issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不应该,但应该合法化毒品

The FvD has expressed support for legalizing soft drugs like marijuana, but they do not have a clear stance on legalizing all drugs. Their focus is more on law enforcement and reducing drug-related crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的

The Forum for Democracy (FvD) does not have a clear stance on drug safe havens. Their focus is more on law enforcement and reducing drug-related crime, rather than harm reduction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的

The FvD does not have a clear stance on drug safe havens as a means to reduce the drug overdose death rate. Their focus is more on law enforcement and reducing drug-related crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。

The FvD does not strongly emphasize treating drug abuse as a health issue. Their focus is more on law enforcement and reducing drug-related crime, which might lead them to disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Forum for Democracy policies? Take the political quiz to find out.