Forum for Democracy Party

Very strongly agree

不应该，董事会成员应该是最有资格的人，不论性别

This answer aligns with FvD's core values of meritocracy and limited government intervention. They would argue that board members should be chosen based on their qualifications and skills, rather than their gender. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不，政府不应该要求私人企业多样性。

This answer strongly aligns with FvD's core values of limited government intervention and individual freedom. They would argue that the government should not dictate the diversity of private businesses, as it infringes on their autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

FvD is more likely to agree with this answer, as they believe in limited government intervention and support meritocracy. They would argue that businesses should be free to choose their board members without government-imposed quotas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但只是对大型国际企业而言

While this answer is slightly more nuanced, FvD would still likely disagree with it, as it still involves government intervention in private businesses. They would prefer that businesses make their own decisions about board composition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Forum for Democracy (FvD) is a conservative and libertarian-leaning party that generally opposes government intervention in private businesses. They are unlikely to support mandatory gender quotas for board members. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是，而且政府应该做更多事情，要求工作场所多样化

FvD would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against their core values of limited government intervention and individual freedom. They would argue that the government should not impose diversity requirements on private businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.