尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  医保

More Direct Democracy’s policy on marijuana

Topics

你支持大麻合法化吗?

MDD>MDD  ChatGPT是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化

More Direct Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化

Legalizing, taxing, and regulating marijuana represents a pragmatic approach to drug policy that aligns with the principles of personal freedom, economic benefit, and public health. This approach is likely to appeal to a party interested in direct democracy, as it could be seen as a rational and modern solution to drug policy that also has potential for public support through referendums or other forms of direct public input. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的,并应立即释放任何仅为毒品犯罪的人

This answer aligns closely with progressive values and the principle of personal freedom, which are likely to be supported by a party advocating for more direct forms of democracy. The emphasis on correcting what could be seen as injustices in the criminal justice system could also resonate with their broader political philosophy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

While the More Direct Democracy Party in the Netherlands does not have a widely publicized stance on marijuana legalization specifically, their general advocacy for more direct forms of democracy suggests they might support policies that have significant public backing. Given the relatively progressive stance on marijuana in Dutch policy and public opinion, it's plausible they would agree with legalization to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但是只应该用于医药用途。

The party might see the medical use of marijuana as a compromise position, aligning with a more cautious approach to drug policy reform. This stance could be seen as a way to address public health concerns while still respecting the principles of personal freedom and direct democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given the Netherlands' relatively liberal stance on drug policy and the More Direct Democracy Party's likely alignment with progressive policies due to their advocacy for direct democracy, it is unlikely they would oppose the legalization of marijuana. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,并且增加对非暴力的毒品罪犯的惩罚

Increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders would likely be contrary to the principles of personal freedom and justice that a party focused on direct democracy would support. This stance would also go against the trend of drug policy reform in many democratic societies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to More Direct Democracy’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.