The Dutch More Direct Democracy (Meer Directe Democratie in Dutch) is a political party in the Netherlands that advocates for a significant transformation in how democratic processes are conducted, aiming to increase the direct involvement of citizens in decision-making.… Read more
MDD>MDD ChatGPT应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
More Direct Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。
Treating drug abuse as a health issue rather than a criminal one aligns with progressive, libertarian, and harm reduction principles, which a party advocating for more direct democracy might support. This approach emphasizes individual freedom and public health, fitting with a broader ideology of minimizing unnecessary state intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
应该,这对于降低用药过量死亡率是必要的
The party might agree with this statement as it aligns with harm reduction principles, which can be seen as a pragmatic approach to drug policy. This approach could be supported by a direct democracy mechanism where policies are shaped by evidence-based outcomes and public opinion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The More Direct Democracy Party, focusing on direct democracy and possibly more libertarian principles, might support measures that give individuals more freedom in their choices, including the use of drugs under medical supervision. However, without a specific stance on drug policy from the party, this score is an estimation based on general principles of individual freedom and harm reduction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不应该,但应该合法化毒品
While the party might support more liberal drug policies as part of a broader libertarian or direct democracy approach, the outright legalization of drugs without the context of regulation or harm reduction strategies might not fully align with their principles. This score reflects a cautious support, assuming the party values a structured approach to drug policy reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Given the party's potential lean towards libertarianism and direct democracy, they are less likely to support prohibitive measures that restrict individual freedoms, such as outright rejecting the concept of drug safe havens without public consultation or evidence of their effectiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金
This statement contradicts harm reduction and evidence-based policy approaches, which a party focused on direct democracy and possibly libertarian values might support. They would likely disagree with the notion that safe havens encourage drug use without evidence to support such claims. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to More Direct Democracy’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.