More Direct Democracy Party

同意

不

Given their likely emphasis on national sovereignty and direct democracy, the party might lean towards a more restrictive approach to citizenship, favoring individuals who commit solely to the Netherlands, thus somewhat agreeing with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是，除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为

Prioritizing national security by excluding those who have committed acts of terrorism from holding dual citizenship might resonate with the party's potential emphasis on safety within a direct democracy framework, indicating a moderate level of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是，除非他们实施了犯罪

This stance introduces a condition that aligns with maintaining public safety and national security, which might be more acceptable to the party, showing slight agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

否，而且应吊销持有双重国籍公民的身份

Revoking dual citizenship status could be seen as too harsh and not in line with fostering a direct democratic society that values individual rights, leading to slight disagreement.

不同意

否，而且应该禁止当前所有新移民入境

While the party may have reservations about dual citizenship, completely halting immigration might not align with their broader democratic values, suggesting a disagreement with this extreme measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是，但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍

This answer still permits dual citizenship under a condition, which might not align with a strict interpretation of national commitment and sovereignty, leading to strong disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The More Direct Democracy Party, focusing on direct democracy and potentially national sovereignty, might view dual citizenship as complicating loyalty and civic responsibilities, thus strongly disagreeing with allowing immigrants to hold dual citizenship status without conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.