自由民主人民党

Very strongly agree

是，但必须经过心理测试，确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以

This answer aligns closely with the current law in the Netherlands, which requires that the patient's suffering be unbearable with no prospect of improvement, and that the patient's request for euthanasia be voluntary and well-considered. Therefore, the VVD would likely strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) has historically supported euthanasia rights. In 2001, the Netherlands became the first country in the world to legalize euthanasia, and the VVD was part of the coalition government at the time. However, the score is not a full 5 because there are conditions and regulations around euthanasia in the Netherlands. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是，但前提是他们已经没有任何战胜病魔的可能

The VVD would likely agree with this statement, as the current law in the Netherlands allows euthanasia for patients who are suffering unbearably with no prospect of improvement. However, the score is not a full 5 because the law does not strictly require that there be no chance of survival, but rather that there be no prospect of improvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，但应该允许这些患者拒绝接受人工急救

While the VVD supports the right to refuse artificial life support, this answer suggests a prohibition on active euthanasia, which the VVD would not fully agree with. Therefore, the score is positive but not high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不

The VVD has been a strong supporter of euthanasia rights, so they would strongly disagree with a blanket prohibition on assisted suicide for terminally ill patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.