JA21 Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

JA21, with its conservative and national security interests, would strongly agree with the condition that whistleblower protections should not compromise national security. This stance reflects a balance between transparency and safeguarding the nation's security interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

This answer aligns closely with JA21's likely stance on law and order and the importance of legal frameworks. They would probably support whistleblower protections but emphasize the importance of legality in the process of obtaining and releasing information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

JA21, being a conservative right party, generally supports measures that enhance transparency and accountability in governance, which aligns with the protection of whistleblowers. However, their specific stance on whistleblower laws is not explicitly detailed in their publicized platforms, suggesting a moderate agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

While JA21 might support measures to ensure that whistleblowers are not unduly penalized, suggesting a reduction in sentences rather than full protection might not fully align with their views on accountability and transparency. This position might be seen as too lenient on potential breaches of law or protocol. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given JA21's advocacy for transparency and accountability, outright opposition to laws protecting whistleblowers would be inconsistent with their broader political goals. However, their conservative stance might make them cautious about broad protections without safeguards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.