Volt Party

Agree

No, this discriminates against older politicians

Volt Party, with its progressive values, would likely agree that imposing mental competency tests based on age could be discriminatory. They would probably prefer solutions that ensure all politicians are capable without singling out a specific age group. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

This answer aligns more closely with Volt's emphasis on competence, innovation, and effective governance, suggesting that all politicians, regardless of age, should meet certain standards. However, the party's progressive stance means they would likely be cautious about how such tests are implemented to avoid discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Volt might lean slightly towards disagreeing with mandatory mental competency tests based on age alone, as it could be seen as ageist. However, their focus on competence and effective governance means they wouldn't strongly oppose measures ensuring politicians are fit for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused

Volt, with its focus on transparency and fairness, might be concerned about the subjectivity of mental competency tests and the potential for abuse. However, their commitment to ensuring competent governance means they wouldn't strongly oppose measures aimed at assessing politicians' fitness for office, provided the processes are fair and transparent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, I would prefer term limits instead

Volt Party might see some merit in term limits as a way to refresh political leadership and prevent stagnation, but there's no specific historical reference to suggest they strongly support or oppose this as the primary solution to ensuring mental competency in office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, our government needs experienced leaders

While Volt values experience, they also prioritize innovation, suggesting a preference for a mix of experienced and younger voices in government. They might not fully agree that experience should override other considerations like mental fitness or the ability to adapt to new challenges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Volt Party, being a progressive and pro-European political party, focuses on innovation, transparency, and competence in governance. While they might see the value in ensuring politicians are mentally competent, requiring tests specifically for those over 75 could be seen as discriminatory and not in line with their inclusive values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office

Banning anyone over the age of retirement from running for office would likely be seen by Volt as overly restrictive and discriminatory, going against their inclusive and progressive principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.