53%
Yes
47%
No
48%
Yes
26%
No
4%
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
10%
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
1%
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
9%
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
2%
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Medical Consensus” has changed over time for 3.7k Netherlands voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Medical Consensus” has changed over time for 3.7k Netherlands voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Netherlands users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9H3LC4Banswered…5mos5MO

there should be an automatic triggering of a peer review with board oversight for doctors found to be providing health advice that is not in scientific consensus. if the results are not in favor of the doctor - if the doctor continues to promote the advice - they should be penalized. if the results are in favor of the doctor and a reversal/shift is caused, they should be rewarded greatly

 @9GVSX33answered…6mos6MO

The change of knowledge in the medical sector is rapidly changing. How can the guidelines for doctors always be rght when history shows that there expertise has also been misleading?