Democrats 66 Party

Very strongly agree

不应该，服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

This answer aligns with D66's values of individual freedom and choice. They would likely argue that individuals should have the right to choose whether or not they want to serve in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

D66 is likely to agree with this statement as they value individual freedom and choice. They would likely argue that mandatory military service infringes on these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该，但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上，不要过于注重军事训练。

While D66 would likely support the focus on education and skill development, they would likely disagree with the mandatory aspect of this proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While D66 might see the value in providing opportunities for those not pursuing further education or employment, they would likely disagree with making this mandatory and specifically tied to military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Democrats 66 (D66) is a progressive and liberal party in the Netherlands. They generally support individual freedom and choice, and are unlikely to support mandatory military service for all 18 year olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的，但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

D66 would likely disagree with this statement as it could be seen as punitive and not in line with their values of individual freedom and rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该，而且应该服役至少 2 年

This answer is in direct opposition to D66's values of individual freedom and choice. They would likely strongly disagree with mandatory military service, especially for a period of two years. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.